|

"New
Dynamic Air Cleaner Supplies Clean room Quality Air"
Article reproduced from "Indoor
Archives", Volume 4, Issue 1.
Sanit-Air Duct Cleaning and Air Testing
In our quest to find the best
air cleaners for residential and commercial buildings, Sanit-Air
has evaluated and tested the full gamut of devices, from ozone
generators and ultra violet lights, to pleated media filters
and electronic air cleaners. Factors incorporated into our
evaluations include:

Initially, I was very skeptical of the Dynamic
Air Cleaner. The one-inch, loosely woven media of the Dynamic
was not very impressive looking. The manufacturer's
representative pointed out the following advantages and
principles of the Dynamic:
-
The Dynamic Air Cleaner attaches a charge to
dust. Charged dust will attract other dust particles that
affix to the charged fibrous surfaces of the Dynamic.
-
The electronic charge on the Dynamic is
created on the interwoven fibers of the "pillow insert" that
has a large surface area to which particles attach.
-
The fibrous pillow is replaced every three
to four months. No maintenance, other than brushing of the
grid surface, is required.
-
An added bonus of the Dynamic Air Cleaner is
the activated carbon insert that will remove odors and
chemicals.
-
The Dynamic Air Cleaner provides a 97%
capture efficiency to particles down to .3 microns.
The scientist in me knew that only HEPA (high
efficiency particulate arrestance) filters could trap
particles at .3 microns and that true HEPA filters could not
be installed in residential HVAC systems. The key difference
in the Dynamic Air Cleaner is that particles are not trapped
due to pore size, but are removed by charge. My skepticism
waned as we received positive feedback from customers and good
results in our microbial testing. However the true test came
when I was hired to conduct particle testing for FDA
compliance in a pharmaceutical clean room. Prior to testing the
clean room, I tried out the new testing equipment in our
office. The concentration of particles (.3 microns and larger)
was less than 200,000 particles/ft/ this level was 3 times
lower than the initial concentration found four months
earlier. Equally surprising was the concentration of less than
70,000 particles/ft for .5 micron and larger particles. Our
office passed criteria for clean room compliance - quite
surprising since the clean room I tested had failed.
|